Canadian federal court rejects application for temporary stay of deportation of a Vietnamese national (2025canlii94654)
Case: TGTH v. Immigration and Citizenship Canada; Department of Public Safety and Emergency Response
Reference number: 2025 CanLII 94654 (FC)
Judgment date: September 18, 2025
Judge: The Honorable Madam Justice Julie Blackhawk
🔹 Overview of the incident
On September 18, 2025, the Canadian Federal Court ruled against Mr. TGTH's application for a temporary stay of deportation to Vietnam.
The applicant argued that he would be in danger if deported, as a follower of the Hoa Hao Buddhist sect, and claimed to be wanted by the Vietnamese authorities. However, the court determined that he did not meet the legal conditions for a temporary stay of deportation.
🔹 The legal principles applied by the Court
The court reiterated that a request for a stay of deportation is only granted if the applicant demonstrates three things:
- There are serious problems with the request for a retrial;
- There is irreparable harm if deported;
- The balance of interests tips in favor of the applicant.
The court also affirmed that Canada has a public interest in the swift execution of deportation orders, in order to ensure the transparency and fairness of the immigration system.
🔹 Actual developments
- On September 5, 2018, the applicant entered Canada on a student permit.
- On September 22, 2020, he filed an asylum application, claiming that the Vietnamese authorities were pursuing him because he followed the Hoa Hao Buddhist sect.
- On May 6, 2022, the Refugee Protection Council (RPD) rejected the application due to credibility concerns.
- In November 2022, he appealed to the Refugee Appeals Board (RAD).
- On January 27, 2023, RAD rejected the appeal.
- In 2023, immigration authorities began deportation proceedings. He was required to report on September 18, 2023, with deportation scheduled for October 3, 2023.
- He did not appear, and on October 4, 2023, an arrest warrant was issued.
- On April 24, 2025, he was arrested and subsequently released on conditional bail. On the same day, he filed an application for a Pre-Deportation Risk Assessment (PRRA).
- On July 9, 2025, PRRA was rejected.
- On August 25, 2025, he received an order to report for deportation.
- On the same day, he requested a postponement of the deportation order, but this was denied on September 17, 2025.
- On September 8, 2025, he filed an Application for Retrial (ALJR) against the PRRA decision.
🔹 Court's ruling
The court ruled that the applicant failed to demonstrate the elements of "serious matter" and "irreparable harm."
Besides:
- There is no evidence that he filed a humanitarian resettlement (H&C) application;
- The claim that the former lawyer was incompetent is unacceptable because it does not comply with formal complaint procedures;
- He violated Canadian immigration law by remaining in Canada without legal status and failing to appear when asked to be deported in 2023;
- Therefore, the balance of interests tilts in favor of the Canadian government to enforce the deportation order.
🔹 Results
- The Federal Court rejected Mr. TGTH's application for a stay of deportation in both cases IMM-19377-25 and IMM-20160-25.
- The ruling was signed by Judge Julie Blackhawk on September 18, 2025.
🔹 Important notes when submitting an asylum application
Several important lessons can be learned from this incident:
- Asylum applications must contain specific and reasonable evidence demonstrating a risk of persecution or mistreatment in the country of origin.
- The testimony must be consistent and reliable; if there are contradictions or exaggerations, the application is likely to be rejected.
- Applicants should provide thorough information about the socio-political circumstances of their country of origin so that the Court can assess the authenticity of the risk.
- Intentionally remaining in Canada after being denied entry or failing to comply with a summons will be considered a lack of good faith and will seriously damage the credibility of your application.
