The Canadian Federal Court rejected the Start-Up Visa application because the project was determined to be a "formal transaction" aimed at obtaining PR (2026fc76).

The analyses below are intended for learning purposes, serving as a basis for self-assessment and the development of a better profile.

On January 19, 2026, the Canadian Federal Court issued ruling 2026 FC 76 (IMM-15977-24), officially rejecting the judicial review application of a group of Start-up Visa (SUV) applicants, thereby upholding IRCC's decision to deny permanent residency.

This ruling holds significant precedent, further solidifying IRCC and the Court's increasingly stringent stance on Start-up Visa applications suspected of being solely for the purpose of obtaining PR rather than building a genuine business.

🔍 SUMMARY OF THE INCIDENT

• Group of 4 applicants applying for permanent residency under the Start-up Visa Program.
• Proposed company: PicIt4Me Tech Design Corp., registered in British Columbia
• Have a Letter of Support from a designated organization (VANTEC Angel Network)
• IRCC rejected the application, concluding that the primary purpose of the project was to obtain Canadian residency status, not to actually conduct business.

The group of applicants then filed an appeal with the Federal Court requesting a review of the IRCC's decision.

⚖️ KEY LEGAL BASIS

The court focused its consideration on Section 89(b) of the Canadian Immigration Regulations, which states that: "A Start-up Visa applicant shall not be deemed to have met the requirements if such fulfillment is based on transactions undertaken primarily to obtain status or privileges under immigration law, rather than to actually conduct business."

In other words, if the project is deemed an "artificial transaction," the application will be rejected, regardless of:

• The company is legally registered.
• Letter of Support
• Paper business records

❌ POINTS THAT CAUSE YOUR APPLICATION TO BE RECEIVED UNFAVORABLE EVALUATION

The Court confirmed that IRCC's assessment was reasonable based on the following factors:

1. No financial statements available.

• The company has been operating for 4 years.
• Is there a T2 tax return?
• Unable to submit financial statements.
• The court ruled that the lack of financial statements was inconsistent with a genuinely operating business and constituted a serious disadvantage when evaluating the application.

2. Do not apply for a Work Permit even if you declare an "urgent need to travel to Canada".

• In the commitment letter, the applicant stated that they urgently needed to travel to Canada to manage their business.
• But they did not submit an application for a work permit.
• He again admitted to entering Canada on a tourist visa to work.

👉 Both IRCC and the Court consider this a sign of a lack of seriousness and raise concerns about the possibility of conducting business without proper authorization.

3. The business plan fails to demonstrate feasibility.

• Highly competitive market
• Low market entry costs
• There are similar competitors.
• Cannot be proven:
  • Actual revenue
  • Market demand and willingness to pay.
  • Risk management capabilities

👉 The court emphasized: There is no obligation to believe predictions on paper if they lack actual evidence.

4. Signs of "applying for PR"

The Court concurred with IRCC that, considering the overall evidence, there was reasonable basis to conclude:

• Business activities that are not commensurate with the company's lifespan.
• Many factors do not indicate a level of commitment and operational efficiency commensurate with a genuine business project.
• Failure to demonstrate genuine business intent.

IMPORTANT LEGAL CONSEQUENCES

• The essential applicant was denied, resulting in the denial of all remaining applicants under the law, without requiring separate consideration.

The court emphasized that this is a mandatory mechanism of the Start-up Visa, not a discretionary decision.

🧭 IMPORTANT MESSAGE FOR START-UP VISA APPLICANTS

The 2026 FC 76 ruling continues to send a very clear message: for a case to be sustainable, applicants need to:

• The business is actually operating.
• There are financial reports, cash flow statements, and actual operating data.
• Having a genuine managerial role in Canada (with proper legal capacity)
• There is evidence from the market - customers - revenue - partners.
• And most importantly: Business objectives must come first; PR is merely a consequence.

Immigration Event Calendar and Live Stream